On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
What does the community feel should be the focus for species at
present? Now that I know that the analysis of existing practice is
about the existing *content* rather than existing *markup*,
That's not entirely true. Existing markup plays a
On 02/02/07, Colin Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
What does the community feel should be the focus for species at
present? Now that I know that the analysis of existing practice is
about the existing *content* rather than existing *markup*,
Scott and Colin, many thanks for your replies; your feedback is much
appreciated.
On 31/01/07, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the important question is: what will it take to
get publishers publishing the kind of species markup you'd like to see?
That's a great question. I guess it's
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I'm very interested in the Species microformat, but the process seems
to have stalled
[...]
Could it be that web
designers and developers of the microformats community do not perceive
the value of a species microformat in the
AM
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Species microformat process
To: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be honest, the
use case for the species microformat is a little bit weak.
In what way do you think it could be weak? What information do you think
is lacking?
It's not clear what the problem
On 30/01/07, Benjamin West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/07, Charles Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm very interested in the Species microformat, but the process seems
to have stalled and I just wanted to poll opinion here as to why that
might be. Is it due to a lack of demand?
To be
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Charles Roper wrote:
I think what I'm trying to get at here is this: at present my feeling
(and this is just a feeling) is that the microfomats gaining most
traction are ones that are related quite closely to social networking
and, dare I say it, Web 2.0 concepts.
On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
I also wanted to ask about the fundamental microformat principle of
paving the cowpaths in relation to hCard. It seems to me that
hCard
was derived from vCard rather than being based on existing markup
practice. How does this square up
I'm very interested in the Species microformat, but the process seems
to have stalled and I just wanted to poll opinion here as to why that
might be. Is it due to a lack of demand? It seems that the successful
microformats have been developed, in the main, by web designers and
developers for web
On 1/30/07, Charles Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm very interested in the Species microformat, but the process seems
to have stalled and I just wanted to poll opinion here as to why that
might be. Is it due to a lack of demand?
Charles, I don't know about demand, but I do know that many
10 matches
Mail list logo
