On Feb 7, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Ryan Cannon wrote:
On Feb 7, 2007, Ryan King wrote:
2. We have prior art that is being ignored. Publishers are already
using ... to do this.
However, UID is not a field that takes a URL for its value, just a
string, so therefore:
http://ryancannon.com/";>Ryan
S
On Feb 7, 2007, Ryan King wrote:
2. We have prior art that is being ignored. Publishers are already
using ... to do this.
However, UID is not a field that takes a URL for its value, just a
string, so therefore:
http://ryancannon.com/";>Ryan
Should be parsed as
URL: http;//ryancannon.com/
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:47 PM, David Janes wrote:
On 2/7/07, Ara Pehlivanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing a stage:
>
> - fragment hcard (anywhere on the net by anybody)
> - points to home page, using class="url"
> - home pag
On 2/7/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Ara Pehlivanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you're missing a stage:
> >
> > - fragment hcard (anywhere on the net by anybody)
> > - points to home page, using class="url"
>
On 2/7/07, Ara Pehlivanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing a stage:
>
> - fragment hcard (anywhere on the net by anybody)
> - points to home page, using class="url"
> - home page, using class="something" rel="something-else", p
On 2/7/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you're missing a stage:
- fragment hcard (anywhere on the net by anybody)
- points to home page, using class="url"
- home page, using class="something" rel="something-else", points to
authoritative hcard
e.g. Ryan King hCards in the wild
On 2/7/07, Ara Pehlivanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, rel=me requires symmetry in order to be trusted at all.
> For this reason, and others XFN is not the simplest way to do
> Authoritative hCards.
I guess the real question is, "who
On 2/7/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're right, rel=me requires symmetry in order to be trusted at all.
For this reason, and others XFN is not the simplest way to do
Authoritative hCards.
I guess the real question is, "who will be creating the partial hCards
that will be referring
On Feb 2, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
On 2/1/07, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
use case - sure - for example, at our conference sites, we markup
speakers with hCard, and this often includes a link to their blog
etc. In this case, a link to an authoritative (or perhaps, to
On Feb 4, 2007, at 2:45 AM, David Janes wrote:
On 2/4/07, Colin Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, it seems the "me" attribute from xfn may not be entirely
desirable.
Is it even needed for a "master"/authoritative hCards to recognize
their children?
-Colin
I can see a use for it. Fo
On 2/4/07, Colin Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, it seems the "me" attribute from xfn may not be entirely
desirable.
Is it even needed for a "master"/authoritative hCards to recognize
their children?
-Colin
I can see a use for it. For example, I'd like to primarily identify
myself
On Feb 2, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
On 2/1/07, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
use case - sure - for example, at our conference sites, we markup
speakers with hCard, and this often includes a link to their blog
etc. In this case, a link to an authoritative (or perhaps, to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John
Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> "me self" can't be anything but tautological; nor is it appropriate
>>when
>> referring to third parties. so:
>
>in English, it is tautological. But restricting the words to their
>roles in XFN and Atom, they mean quite dif
On 2/1/07, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
use case - sure - for example, at our conference sites, we markup
speakers with hCard, and this often includes a link to their blog
etc. In this case, a link to an authoritative (or perhaps, to be even
less strict "detailed") hCard may be somethi
Andy,
(apologies for the tardiness, I'm in one of those old fashioned,
unconnected airomoplanes)
"me self" can't be anything but tautological; nor is it appropriate
when
referring to third parties. so:
in English, it is tautological. But restricting the words to their
roles in XFN and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben
Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>I was initially going to argue that "self me" was tautological, but
>>in fact, in this sense it is not, and indeed, the addition of
>>bookmark is probably tautological.
>>
>> So, I'd probably +1 this suggestion, […]
>
>+1 from
16 matches
Mail list logo
