Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Casciano
On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Robert Bachmann wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for your feedback. Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link aren't covered by hAtom 0.1. So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our own extraction methods, which I'll outline with

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-23 Thread Ryan King
On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Chris Casciano wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Robert Bachmann wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for your feedback. Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link aren't covered by hAtom 0.1. So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-23 Thread Ryan King
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote: Is there TBD section of the wiki to start the discussion about 0.2? As far as I can tell, no, but David Janes may know better. David? -rk ___ microformats-discuss mailing list

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-23 Thread David Janes -- BlogMatrix
I've just made a small reorg on hatom-issues [1]. It should be fairly clear where to start adding your suggestions and proposals for what goes into hAtom 0.2. If it's fairly clear what the exact atom analogy is (e.g. Feed Title), there's a place for that. And if it's more handwavy, there's a

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-22 Thread Robert Bachmann
Hi Chris, Thanks for your feedback. Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link aren't covered by hAtom 0.1. So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our own extraction methods, which I'll outline with some pseudo-code. Chris Casciano wrote: In Example 1:

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-20 Thread Chris Casciano
On Mar 20, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Ryan King wrote: On Mar 19, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Ryan King wrote: On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Fellas, I wrote a post with an itsy-bitsy dose of hAtom in it: http://fuzzycontent.com/index.php/2006/03/14/context-wants-to-be- free-too/ I

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-19 Thread Ryan King
On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Fellas, I wrote a post with an itsy-bitsy dose of hAtom in it: http://fuzzycontent.com/index.php/2006/03/14/context-wants-to-be- free-too/ I can't get any of the listed tools to validate it, though. Can you lend me a hand with your

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-19 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,On 3/19/06, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Fellas, I wrote a post with an itsy-bitsy dose of hAtom in it: http://fuzzycontent.com/index.php/2006/03/14/context-wants-to-be- free-too/ I can't get any of the listed tools to validate it,

[uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

2006-03-14 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Fellas, I wrote a post with an itsy-bitsy dose of hAtom in it: http://fuzzycontent.com/index.php/2006/03/14/context-wants-to-be-free-too/ I can't get any of the listed tools to validate it, though. Can you lend me a hand with your expertize and tell me if I am doing something wrong? :DG