[uf-discuss] include-pattern semantics

2006-10-17 Thread Ciaran McNulty
When the include-pattern[1] is used, the spec says that 'include' on the object element to indicate that that object refers to a subtree which should be included in its place' [2]. What I'm interested in is what happens to any additional classes that are applied to the inclusion element (i.e.

Re: [uf-discuss] include-pattern semantics

2006-10-17 Thread Brian Suda
This is/has been an outstanding issue for some time. There are a few examples in the Test suite, but no one is sure if the tests are correct. Both Tails and X2V interpert the spec differently (so far no one has really complianed and made it an issue). I'm CC'ing the -dev list because in the