Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
When browsers or extensions expose linked resources, they generally
do so for a selected set of link types (for example, link
rel=stylesheet is not exposed)
It is when you have a series of alternate stylesheets (in Firefox,
anyhow), isn't it?
and often do so with
Has any thought been given to the pre-existing in-the-wild use of rel=EditURI?
link rel=EditURI type=application/rsd+xml title=RSD
href=/xmlrpc.php?rsd /
--
Chris Griego
On 5/25/07, Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, everybody.
** Context **
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp
I don't know.
Following an EditURI link does not take you to a page where you can edit
the current resource (or resource fragment, for that matter), but
instead to a computer-readable description of available services:
http://archipelago.phrasewise.com/display?page=oldsite/1330.html
Blogger
On Sat, 2007-26-05 at 13:48 +1000, Michael MD wrote:
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp Montreal
(http://www.rocococamp.info/), there's an effort to work out some
universal conventions for wiki engines to indicate that a page is
editable.
Good idea in theory ... but what about the
I wonder, though, if marking up the edit link has a real use case.
What kind of tool would make use of it, and in what way?
A little testimony: I'm programming a CMS that enables several links
to edit content. One of these links is to a global edit this article
page ; the other links are for
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
On Fri, 2007-25-05 at 19:16 -0700, John Panzer wrote:
I'd like to start a draft rel-edit page on microformats.org; but first
I'd like to gather some feedback on this mailing list.
Just FYI: The Atom Publishing
On May 27, 2007, at 5:09 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
It doesn't make any sense to me. When browsers (e.g. Opera) or
extensions (e.g. Firefox Link Widgets) properly expose linked
resources, they are just as visible as anchors. That would work
very nicely.
When browsers or
On May 25, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
On Fri, 2007-25-05 at 19:16 -0700, John Panzer wrote:
I'd like to start a draft rel-edit page on microformats.org; but
first
I'd like to gather some feedback on this mailing list.
Just FYI: The Atom Publishing Protocol draft spec uses
Hi, everybody.
** Context **
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp Montreal
(http://www.rocococamp.info/), there's an effort to work out some
universal conventions for wiki engines to indicate that a page is
editable.
The current focus is on an icon next to the edit this page link (or
language
Evan Prodromou wrote:
...
I think this microformat would be best defined using the semantics of
the rel attribute of a links. For example, on the how-to-play page
on the microformats wiki, this link:
a href=/wiki?title=how-to-playamp;action=editEdit/a
would be changed to:
a
Hi Evan,
I like it! This would also be useful for linking to the editable
version of data for a REST Service Description.
-enp
On May 25, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Hi, everybody.
** Context **
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp Montreal
(http://www.rocococamp.info/),
On Fri, 2007-25-05 at 19:16 -0700, John Panzer wrote:
I'd like to start a draft rel-edit page on microformats.org; but first
I'd like to gather some feedback on this mailing list.
Just FYI: The Atom Publishing Protocol draft spec uses link rel=edit
.../ to point from a read-only
So, on the tail of RecentChangesCamp Montreal
(http://www.rocococamp.info/), there's an effort to work out some
universal conventions for wiki engines to indicate that a page is
editable.
Good idea in theory ... but what about the possible misuse by spambots
crawling for places to post their
13 matches
Mail list logo
