Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 12:53 schrieb Ciaran McNulty: > On 12/13/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe that the (%inline) refers to what can contain -- > > inline elements. See same structure for headings: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5 > > Aha, t

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

>The fact it can't contain block level elements still makes it unusable >for my needs though (I can't fit my hCard into entirely inline >elements, so my pages don't validate correctly if I add ). > >-Ciaran But you can still use hCard -- just wrap it in something else (). is allowed, not mandate

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

On 13 Dec 2006, at 11:53, Ciaran McNulty wrote: so my pages don't validate correctly if I add Actually, it's more severe than just not validating. Nesting block level elements within ADDRESS triggers error-handling in browsers, such that the DOM does not reflect your mark-up. Mark-up such

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

On 12/13/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe that the (%inline) refers to what can contain -- inline elements. See same structure for headings: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5 Aha, that sounds probable (apologies to Siegfried). The fact it can't contain b

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Ciaran, >On 12/11/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> To address the poster's concerns, is a block-level >element, not inline, > >This would seem to contradict that? >http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.6 > >I've stayed away from using on some of my pages precisely >becau

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

On 12/13/06, Siegfried Gipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is an element designed to contain contact information. So if you want to include contact information use . That is indepenent of using hCard or not. is a html element, specified by the w3c, hCard is an attribute vocabulary, designed by micr

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 10:11 schrieb Ciaran McNulty: > On 12/11/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To address the poster's concerns, is a block-level element, not > > inline, > > This would seem to contradict that? > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.6 > > I've

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

On 12/11/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To address the poster's concerns, is a block-level element, not inline, This would seem to contradict that? http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.6 I've stayed away from using on some of my pages precisely because of this, so I

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 20:45 schrieb Tim White: > To address the poster's concerns, is a block-level element, not > inline, and it is suggested but not mandated. Likewise, skills are > optional, as are linking them. > > At least that's how I read the spec. Anyone see it differently? (I've a

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >>Perhaps you missed this comment: >> >> >> >> >>in which a poster describes how he rejected hResume because it sought to >>ch

Re: Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

> From Any Mabbett >Perhaps you missed this comment: > > > > >in which a poster describes how he rejected hResume because it sought to >change his publishing behaviour. To address the poster's

Microformats *do* seek to change behaviour (was: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" implies romantic relationship?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Subject: Re: XFN usage stats and Re: [uf-discuss] rel="muse" >implies romantic relationship? Did you perhaps forget to change that? >microformats do not try to alter people's publishing behavior in an >unnatural way - and a