How about a courtesy link on the front page of the Web site:
If this is not the Microformats you're looking for, perhaps you meant http://
--Bob.
This is what Mike Schinkel microformats-discuss@microformats.org said
about RE: [uf-discuss] Re: MicroFormat Ltd on 7 Nov 2006 at 15:14
I highly
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin
Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things to be handled when your
guidance on
how to handle
On 11/9/06 12:21 AM, Bob Jonkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a courtesy link on the front page of the Web site:
I've created a disambiguation page on the wiki for the term microformat
based on some wording that Chris Messina authored. I think this should
suffice for now.
On 11/9/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a disambiguation page on the wiki for the term microformat
based on some wording that Chris Messina authored. I think this should
suffice for now.
http://microformats.org/wiki/microformat
Looks good and should suffice.
Chris
suggest we all calm down
Just for the record, I was never no calm about it. I only brought it up as
something to be aware of and then several people responded that (in essense)
my concerns were invalid, and I was simply replying that I disagreed and
felt that it was a potential issue. I'm
Hey Mike, I don't think that Rohit was talking about you specifically.
In fact, I'll take the heat for bringing this up and stoking the
embers in the first place.
Rohit et al's points stand: this isn't the place to discuss legal
matters, nor to conjecture about what might or might not happen.
I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Schinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things to be handled when your guidance on
how to handle the
On Nov 8, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike
Schinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there has been no related-guidance prior to this email. As sich I do
not appreciate being chastized in a public forum for voilating your
choice of how you would like things
I highly doubt that it will cause real confusion; furthermore, who would
be sued? No one owns the microformats name besides the community
-- which is why it's a community mark. We really don't have any assets or
formal structure, so it would be rather difficult to bring this to court.
The
