In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben
Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there no interrest in such a microformat like rel=pavatar?
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this community. Perhaps
someone
can give a reference?
On Dec 28, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
On 1/23/07 4:12 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
It's been listed as a rejected microformat:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats
though I can find no such rejection, by this community. Perhaps
someone
can give
Hi,
Is there no interrest in such a microformat like rel=pavatar?
/Jeena
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:59:43 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
My Name is Jeena Paradies and I am the author of the Personal Avatar
Specification: http://pavatar.com/spec
The Personal Avatar (short
Hello Jeena,
I looked over the spec quick... and I thought I'd make some comments.
In the spec, it mentions the HTTP X-Pavatar header... Did you
consider at all using the HTTP Link header instead? As in...
Link: http://example.com/pic.png; rel=pavatar
The HTTP Link header is semantically
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In the spec, it mentions the HTTP X-Pavatar header... Did you
consider at all using the HTTP Link header instead? As in...
Link: http://example.com/pic.png; rel=pavatar
ITYM:
link
Hello Andy,
On 12/30/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In the spec, it mentions the HTTP X-Pavatar header... Did you
consider at all using the HTTP Link header instead? As in...
Link:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
ITYM:
link href=http://example.com/pic.png; rel=pavatar
No, I meant the HTTP Link header.
Apologies; I misread your post.
--
Andy Mabbett
Merry Bloomin' Christmas!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there no interrest in such a microformat like rel=pavatar?
/Jeena
Without getting into the technicalities of ‘what makes a microformat’
at this stage, I think another reason for lack of interest is that
really, the hCard microformat can already provide the
Jeena:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there no interrest in such a microformat like rel=pavatar?
From the spec a few things are not clear to me. For example in 3a what URL
is being called, by whom, and for what purpose? In 3b, what HTML page would
contain the link and how does it relate to
10 matches
Mail list logo
