Ben Ward wrote:
It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
work, but I wanted to get feedback from this community before
proceeding. We have a fantastic opportunity in front of us now - who in
this community thinks that we should work with the W3C on this endeavor?
Tantek Celik wrote:
Completely agreed w all of Ben Ward's points.
Even the ones that seem to state that RDFa does not operate in the realm
of HTML? The reason I raise this point is that RDFa will be a W3C
standard, applicable to XHTML1.1 and XHTML2 by the end of October 2008
(roughly). We're in
Scott Reynen wrote:
That, or we'd compromise RDFa.
I can almost guarantee that neither side is going to compromise their
set of beliefs. The Microformats community is too hard headed to do so,
and the RDFa community has a very long, arduous W3C process to consider
when changing anything major
Hi Toby / all
On 21/8/08 14:49, Toby A Inkster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I've decided to use class=dday for date of death and
class='flourished-start' and class='flourished-end' for flourished
dates
Where either date is circa I've included ca. in the span with bday,
dday,
On 21/8/08 18:41, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Martin
On 14/8/08 15:48, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*family-name-preposition* is probably more accurate to what you are
trying to describe von in dutch simply means of or from
Oh I
Michael Smethurst wrote:
On 21/8/08 18:41, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Martin
On 14/8/08 15:48, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*family-name-preposition* is probably more accurate to what you are
trying to describe von in
Hello
The data I'm working with has an optional pseudonym field on the people
table.
Some of the values in here look like nicknames (eg le cadet, le grand,
JC001):
http://bbc-hackday.dyndns.org:2840/people/44970
http://bbc-hackday.dyndns.org:2840/people/31944
As there's been some discussion about moving drafts into specification
status lately, I'd like to address one of the outstanding issues in
hResume.
The problem that has arisen quite a few times, is that a lot of people
with a resume are currently employed and don't know what to provide as
the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael Smethurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now I'm marking them all up with class=nickname. Is this stretching
the semantics of nickname too much?
Should I just be POSH and use class=pseudonym?
Even if you use class=pseudonym you still need to decide
Hi Ciaran
On 29/8/08 12:30, Ciaran McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael Smethurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now I'm marking them all up with class=nickname. Is this stretching
the semantics of nickname too much?
Should I just be POSH and use
Hello Manu, all
Manu I think you need to explain that RDFa is a way of expressing
semantics in html, not just a way of expressing RDF annotations in html
Manu Sporny wrote:
Ben Ward wrote:
It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
work, but I wanted to get
I've been refering to the xfn-brainstorming wiki for guidance on
additional xfn ralationships. I can see from the wiki page that there's
a desire to find a word to define the inverse of 'follower' but what I
need is to offer users more options to choose from on both sides of the
relationship -
Samuel Santos has started blogging about the HTML5 + RDFa/Microformats
discussion that we've been having in WHATWG:
http://www.samaxes.com/2008/08/29/the-semantic-web-and-rdfa/
-- manu
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
