On 4/13/06, Mark Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I second this (although I have no good Google contacts either).
Sniping from the sidelines makes us look petty and insular. Instead
of making assumptions about big bad evil Google ignoring open
standards and locking users in, have we tried
On 4/12/06, Jude Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be appropriate to add this to
http://microformats.org/wiki/chat-examples under a tentative *might be
relevant to chat* podcast transcripts heading?
Sure. It's a kind of chat... though I wonder if there isn't some
distinction to be
I have a weird feeling I may have had something to do with this (see the
comments):
http://blog.davidjanes.com/mtarchives/2006_04.html#003591
Regards, etc...
David
Chris Messina wrote:
At least the folks under the Yahoo umbrella get it:
http://upcoming.org/news/archives/2006/04/12/invite_f/
Anyone ever remember HumanML - taken on by Oasis at some point.
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=humanmarkup
It's not really micro, but something may be borrowed from it.
I agree there are different aspects of communication required in any
transcript.
steven
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Chris Messina wrote:
I disagree, but then I've always been a fan of DLs. The problem that I
see with only using q cite and bq is that they're ways of
loosely pairing a speaker and what they've said. I don't know of any
way to closely couple the two.
At least with
On 4/14/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least with DT and DD there's a clear correlation for the speaker
with her/his words:
Chris, the one big problem I understand with DL for dialogue is
that it does not describe order. Or at least, that's the
interpretation/specification
Tim,Have you considered adding a parameter or two indicating who created the citation. Citations in the paper world (e.g., footnotes, endnotes) are locked into the document they exit. Citations in the digital world can float freely -- that's the point of microformats. Hence, it makes sense to
On Apr 13, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:
I will donate a free copy of Greasemonkey Hacks to the first person
to write a Greasemonkey script that
* adds a remind me with Google Calendar button (
http://www.google.com/googlecalendar/event_publisher_guide.html ) next
to any event
Hi Greg,Thanks for the heads up on that one. I confused that part of last night's rough schema. In fact, the Source category is for a citation about where the information came from (as you recommend), and the Location category is intended for information about where the work of art is physically
On 4/14/06, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:
I will donate a free copy of Greasemonkey Hacks to the first person
to write a Greasemonkey script that
http://randomchaos.com/software/firefox/greasemonkey/googlehcalendar/
On 14 Apr 2006, at 10:55, Scott Reynen wrote:
So between jumping ahead 7 hours on my parsing and then jumping
back only 5 hours on Google's parsing, I end up 2 hours in the
future. So am I wrong and/or are Google and Upcoming both wrong?
Upcoming is wrong - timezones have been on their
11 matches
Mail list logo
