Hey Toby,
Yes... you could do that... It would be correct to do so...
semantically speaking.
See ya
On 8/10/07, Toby A Inkster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On http://example.org/article/my-php-tutorial/ I might use rel=tag to link
to http://example.org/tag/programming/.
But on
On http://example.org/article/my-php-tutorial/ I might use rel=tag to link
to http://example.org/tag/programming/.
But on http://example.org/tag/programming/ should I use rev=tag to link to
each tagged article?
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
[Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux]
On 8/10/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Toby,
Yes... you could do that... It would be correct to do so...
semantically speaking.
--- yes, semantically, rev is the opposite or rel. The downside is
that you are creating a tagspace, so anyone can link to it, just like
With specific discussion of semantic stuff:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-html5/?ca=dgr-lnxw01NewHTML
--
David Janes
Founder, BlogMatrix
http://www.blogmatrix.com
http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
