Re: calendar (and other) items aren't always tidy (was: Re: [uf-discuss] using microschema)

2007-11-27 Thread Paul Wilkins
On Nov 27, 2007 11:57 AM, ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I'm thinking too far outside the box, but it looks like the formats proposed thus far all assume that the (html) content we'll be semanticizing is going to written in such a way as to accommodate the format, that all the information

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: ‘XHTML’ references to ‘HTML’

2007-11-27 Thread Ben Ward
Right, I'll put this on my to-do list. I don't know how much work it's going to be yet, but let's say I'll plan to start updating pages on Friday. That's the rest of the week for anyone else to object to the change. The change I propose is: • Update the first mention of ‘HTML’ or

[uf-discuss] Announcement: WebCamp workshop on Social Network Portability

2007-11-27 Thread John Breslin
I am happy to announce the Social Network Portability workshop (co-located with BlogTalk) to be held in Cork, Ireland on the 2nd March 2008. You can view the wiki page for this event at http://webcamp.org/SocialNetworkPortability Social network portability is a term that has been used to

Re: calendar (and other) items aren't always tidy (was: Re: [uf-discuss] using microschema)

2007-11-27 Thread Scott Reynen
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:57 PM, ken wrote: The idea of a semantic web is absolutely cool and I'm really looking forward to the day when we have some standards agreed upon and we can all start implementing them. I think we're long past that day, not just with microformats but also with RDF

Re: [uf-discuss] using microschema

2007-11-27 Thread Tatsuya Noyori
Hello Ben, Thank you for your comments, I am thinking about microformats and Atom and Form that is made by users, such as RightFields(http://www.staggernation.com/mtplugins/RightFields/). Atom does not contain html:head, therefore Atom cannot use html:head/@profile and XMDP. This is the first

[uf-discuss] Re: calendar (and other) items aren't always tidy

2007-11-27 Thread ken
On 11/27/2007 02:55 AM Paul Wilkins wrote: On Nov 27, 2007 11:57 AM, ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I'm thinking too far outside the box, but it looks like the formats proposed thus far all assume that the (html) content we'll be semanticizing is going to written in such a way as to

[uf-discuss] Re: calendar (and other) items aren't always tidy

2007-11-27 Thread ken
Scott, Thanks for your reply and pointing out some of the things you did. I don't want to start a debate, but just say that I've often found it necessary to consider hypothetical scenarios when doing just about any kind of programming. My small example wasn't either at all implausible; in

Re: [uf-discuss] using microschema

2007-11-27 Thread Tom Morris
On Nov 27, 2007 4:44 PM, Tatsuya Noyori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Ben, Thank you for your comments, I am thinking about microformats and Atom and Form that is made by users, such as RightFields(http://www.staggernation.com/mtplugins/RightFields/). Atom does not contain html:head,

Re: [uf-discuss] Wiki order?

2007-11-27 Thread ryan
On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Klaus Mueller wrote: So I have a few questions about the wiki, which I didn't found in the wiki or the mailing archive. I would expand the how-to-play article. * You don't use Mediawiki Categories. Why? I dont't want to chance this rule, I only want to explain it