Re: [uf-discuss] Current state of grouping proposal

2008-07-02 Thread Bob Jonkman
I think the grouping mechanism can be accomplished with XOXO, http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo --Bob. 1 Jul 2008 18:08 Xavier Badosa microformats- [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm a little confused about the current state of the grouping proposal. I'm not sure even if the uf-community is working

Re: [uf-discuss] Human and machine readable data format

2008-07-02 Thread Bob Jonkman
1 Jul 2008 6:28 Scott Reynen microformats- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The difference with ISO dates is we've previously defined them as content; I'm suggesting that's a mistaken definition, as these dates don't function as content in our reference standard iCalendar. I disagree. In an

Re: [uf-discuss] Human and machine readable data format

2008-07-02 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 3 juil. 2008 à 01:36, Guillaume Lebleu a écrit : In other words, if I want to write my date in French in an en-us html document, I'd have to attach lang=fr to my date or its containing content, […] Do you still see this as dangerous practice? not dangerous but unpractical in the case

Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Human and machine readable data format

2008-07-02 Thread Breton Slivka
I honestly believe the bloat to parsers would be significant sorry, I meant I Honestly believe the 'bloat' to parsers would _not_ be significant ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org