On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On 7/30/06, Fred Stutzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, of course it isn't the overwhelmingly dominant bibliographic/citation
format
It's not even close. If you ask 100 people in my field about BibTeX,
my guess is at lea
b format.
Bruce
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Fred Stutzman
claimID.com
919-260-8508
AIM: chimprawk
___
microfor
databases, before XML, etc, and it shows.
I don't disagree, bib has been around a long time.
Bruce
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Fr
ohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/archives/2006/07/29/csl-progress>
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Fred Stutzman
claimID.com
919-260-8508
AIM: chimprawk
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Simon Cozens wrote:
Fred Stutzman:
I believe our task could be as simple as microformatting the bib format.
That's a good idea, but could easily get bogged down in months of committee
work (http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-formats) so I think it's probably
-- Norm Schryer
___
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Fred Stutzman
claimID.com
919-260-8508
/06/creating-social-web-of-trust-with.html
[5]
http://chimprawk.blogspot.com/2006/06/creating-social-web-of-trust-with_22.html
--
Fred Stutzman
claimID.com
919-260-8508
AIM: chimprawk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats
