ent fragment as well.
Keith
[1] http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml - the
canonical description of eRDF
[2] http://getsemantic.com/wiki/ERDF - a wiki page about eRDF
--
Keith Alexander
http://semwebdev.keithalexander.co.uk/blog/
s every problem. @profile can let people solve
problems for themselves .
Cheers,
Keith
--
Keith Alexander
http://semwebdev.keithalexander.co.uk/blog/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
HTML should be semantic all the time. There shouldn't be another
category of HTML that is, and one that isn't.
Ideally perhaps, but as we all know (and this is the reason this
discussion is taking place), most HTML on the web contains significant
amounts of presentational markup. Presentatio
If you really have to make up a new name... then how about... SHTML.
(Short for "Semantic HTML".)
except that it is already well-known as a file extension for html
containing Server Side Includes.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats
tain principles. Without a distinction
between 'HTML data formats' and 'Microformats', there is a risk of the
perception that:
- The microformats community endorses an html data format, when they don't.
- The developers of an HTML data format endorse the microformats
pri
ta formats )
Keith
----
Keith Alexander
http://semwebdev.keithalexander.co.uk/blog/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/l
