[uf-discuss] Re: Microformats for scientific papers

2006-02-19 Thread Alf Eaton
On 19 Feb 2006, at 15:54, Ryan Cannon wrote: I like your use of space-separated class names (e.g. citation reference book), but you do have a little bit of redundancy: - abbr implies an abbreviation, so class=journal-title-abbr could just be journal-title That's true, but it's going

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Microformats for scientific papers

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Reynen
On Feb 19, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Alf Eaton wrote: On 19 Feb 2006, at 15:54, Ryan Cannon wrote: I like your use of space-separated class names (e.g. citation reference book), but you do have a little bit of redundancy: - abbr implies an abbreviation, so class=journal-title-abbr could just

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Microformats for scientific papers

2006-02-19 Thread Alf Eaton
On 19 Feb 2006, at 18:26, Scott Reynen wrote: On Feb 19, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Alf Eaton wrote: On 19 Feb 2006, at 15:54, Ryan Cannon wrote: - li id=ref16a name=ref16 is redundant and may be (not sure) illegal. THe (X)HTML validator doesn't seem to complain, so I think it's ok. The

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Microformats for scientific papers

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Reynen
On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Alf Eaton wrote: Great! I hadn't realised it worked that way, so you can just use #ref1 to link to the li id=ref1. Do all browsers handle that properly? Not all, but enough that there's little reason not to follow the spec:

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Microformats for scientific papers

2006-02-19 Thread Alf Eaton
On 19 Feb 2006, at 20:29, Scott Reynen wrote: On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Alf Eaton wrote: Great! I hadn't realised it worked that way, so you can just use #ref1 to link to the li id=ref1. Do all browsers handle that properly? Not all, but enough that there's little reason not to