Martin McEvoy wrote:
http://halindrome.blogspot.com/2008/09/why-we-do-what-we-do.html
Thanks Manu for an interesting post, I have made some comments ;-)
I am a bit worried about Shane's other post
Shane wrote:
Unlike microformats, the idiom for annotating your content does not
conflict
Tantek Celik wrote:
eventually decided that it was time that someone started to experiment
with the broad semantic HTML *today* work being done by modern web
designers, solving today's real world web problems, with shared
vocabularies based on existing standards. I met up with Kevin Marks
who
Sarven Capadisli wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you want to use RDFa? For the same reason you want to use
microformats. Because you care about machines understanding what is on your
page, not just humans.
Is it not the other
Interesting blog post by Shane McCarron of XHTML2 fame. He has been
involved in the standards community since 1985. His name is on just
about every major HTML standard to come out of the W3C - if you use HTML
4.01, XHTML1.0, XHTML 1.1, or will use XHTML2 (to name a few), you're
using specs that he
Manu Sporny wrote:
Interesting blog post by Shane McCarron of XHTML2 fame. He has been
involved in the standards community since 1985. His name is on just
about every major HTML standard to come out of the W3C - if you use HTML
4.01, XHTML1.0, XHTML 1.1, or will use XHTML2 (to name a few),
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you want to use RDFa? For the same reason you want to use
microformats. Because you care about machines understanding what is on your
page, not just humans.
Is it not the other way around in the microformats
[1] http://tantek.com/log/2003/01.html#L20030114
-Original Message-
From: Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:47:54
To: Microformats Discussmicroformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Today, Tomorrow, and Someday Problems
Manu Sporny wrote
