My first post to this list
(http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008164.html)
was actually asking this very question about using microformats to
show which areas of a web page spiders should concentrate on.
Ryan sent me the link to the robots-exclusion page but w
On May 4, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
On 4 May 2007, at 22:19, Ted Drake wrote:
What’s the traction for something like this and “no-follow” to get
integrated into the microformat platform?
Well, robots-nocontent is not part of the the robots-exclusion
draft, which in itself has not b
On 4 May 2007, at 22:19, Ted Drake wrote:
What’s the traction for something like this and “no-follow” to get
integrated into the microformat platform?
Well, robots-nocontent is not part of the the robots-exclusion draft,
which in itself has not been updated for over 18 months.
I contacted
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-May/009504.html
On 5/4/07, Ted Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was a bit of a surprise on the yahoo search blog.
It's using the word "tag" incorrectly. It seems the search department is
adding a new microformat-like function th
This was a bit of a surprise on the yahoo search blog.
Its using the word tag incorrectly. It seems the search department is
adding a new microformat-like function that will allow us to tell spiders
what parts of the page are insignificant to SEO.
http://www.ysearchblog.com/archives/000444.html
