Paul Lee (이기수) wrote:
IIUC, part of the reason why hproduct has been under discussion for
quite awhile is b/c of the debate between p-v vs. more defined
attributes. p-v is quite helpful b/c the attributes users care about
change over time. Take cameras, for instance. Did anyone care about
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Manu Sporny mspo...@digitalbazaar.com wrote:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hproduct-issues#HP6_-_P-V_seems_like_a_catch-all_for_hProduct
hProduct currently allows the author to use the P-V pattern for anything
that doesn't fit neatly into hProduct. While it is
IIUC, part of the reason why hproduct has been under discussion for
quite awhile is b/c of the debate between p-v vs. more defined
attributes. p-v is quite helpful b/c the attributes users care about
change over time. Take cameras, for instance. Did anyone care about
megapixels 10 years ago?
http://microformats.org/wiki/hproduct-issues#HP6_-_P-V_seems_like_a_catch-all_for_hProduct
hProduct currently allows the author to use the P-V pattern for anything
that doesn't fit neatly into hProduct. While it is true that this is a
nice way to expand hProduct and see where future versions of
