Re: One issue per thread (was: Re: [uf-new] hProduct issues HP1-HP7)

2009-02-27 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > Could you please explain why it's better to discourage per-issue threads > on the mailing list and instead direct people to the wiki? Why are we > discouraging one form of recorded communication over another? I have written up a page that exp

One issue per thread (was: Re: [uf-new] hProduct issues HP1-HP7)

2009-02-22 Thread Manu Sporny
Tantek Celik wrote: > Please follow-up on the wiki and also one email announcing a batch > of new issues is sufficient. Let's try to keep emails to a minimum > for notification only, and capture discussion/iteration on the wiki. The reason I put each of these in a separate e-mail is to separate i

Re: [uf-new] hProduct issues HP1-HP7

2009-02-18 Thread Martin McEvoy
Great start on a product microformat Paul, Martin McEvoy wrote: + 1 from me on all issues HP1-HP7 To be honest one of the issues highlighted by Manu, the "p-v" property I don't quite understand ... what does it "mean" ? the lack of examples and data concerns me too sorry. OK I do underst

Re: [uf-new] hProduct issues HP1-HP7

2009-02-18 Thread Martin McEvoy
+ 1 from me on all issues HP1-HP7 To be honest one of the issues highlighted by Manu, the "p-v" property I don't quite understand ... what does it "mean" ? the lack of examples and data concerns me too sorry. Thanks Tantek Celik wrote: Thanks Manu for documenting some hProduct issues on

Re: [uf-new] hProduct issues HP1-HP7

2009-02-18 Thread Tantek Celik
Thanks Manu for documenting some hProduct issues on the wiki. I have added my comments to each one. http://microformats.org/wiki/hproduct-issues In short I agree that all of the issues raised so far are issues and went further on some of them. Please follow-up on the wiki and also one email an