In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Document the implicit schemas that the content examples imply.
Every word in that sentence matters.
On the contrary: implicit is redundant. The alternative:
Document the schemas implied by the content examples.
reads
On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Brian Suda wrote:
Quantity does not equate quality!
Right. I think we tend to get caught up in whether or not the
numbers are convincing to our fellow community members, and lose
track of the important question: whether or not the end result is
convincingly
Frances Berriman wrote:
On 12/09/2007, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should call it what it is:
The Accepted Limitations of Microformats
Yeah, that would work.
I have created the wiki page, everyone please feel free to note issues
and add other sections on the page:
I'd second that.
Even if users are just plopping blobs of data that is recognizable to
humans when presented in a blog, but unstructured, we can still make
sense
of those blobs and structure them.
Seeing what people want to do makes more sense that imposing from on
high. That is typical
I have to second this one as well.
In fact I blogged about this some time ago:
http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000583.html
nicely of course, but the reality was that for 2 years, I got slammed
and treated badly by the folks who started it, and then once I made
them sit down and
Frances Berriman wrote:
I imagine it will be valuable as a primer for those interested in
creating some type of microformat (or wondering if microformats are
indeed for them) and maybe how the process works.
Good, as that is one of the goals of the document :)
Talking of... I note that one
