...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/d4781105/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
-- next part
/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/006c181f/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/006c181f/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Josh Luthman wrote:
That letter makes me sick. I still stand by Tranzeo on this issue
as I believe they did the right thing.
The truth of the matter is that it doesn't matter who, exactly, was
at fault. It is clear from some of my customers that the problem is
not
StarOS's refusal to work with MT in the 5 an 10mhz channel sizes is what
caused me to drop StarOS. If I see one of my suppliers playing the
proprietary game in an area that has been non-proprietary i.e. ubiquiti
works with all... I will drop them. Proprietary hurts my business in
the long
The big difference for me is I have never heard of Tranzeo removing
threads from forums or changing wiki pages when there is a problem. It
seem to me that Damien and staff roll their sleeves up and take care of
the problem.
On the other hand I know of a couple of threads that have vanished
mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/f4f827d7/attachment.html
Two separate boards. Right now we have an x86 Mikrotik router on both ends,
one of the links is using RB532's and the other is actually a Redline. This
is a 24 mile link and we are needing more capacity. At the moment with the
limited tower space we're going to be installing some dual polarity
With OSPF you can use equal cost, and it will quasi load balance. For the
extra boost you mention, you can put an additional cost to force each side
to upload on a certain link. This would allow you to force it to something
similar to the full duplex nature of Nstreme Dual, but keep the
9 matches
Mail list logo
