7.html
> [3] https://lists.launchpad.net/mimblewimble/msg00087.html
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/
t fix multisig. And even if a new
> libsecp makes incompatible signatures, we can just wipe whatever testnet
> we're on (assuming we're that far). So why wouldn't that be a better
> placeholder? We can still consider upstream libsecp Schnorr a blocker.
>
> Thanks!
> - Ig
> circuits out of attempting to satisfy a set of invalid kernels.
>
I think your thinking in terms of kernels is wrong; kernels have no
amounts and can't inflate or deflate the currency; they can't really
be "invalid" in this sense. Just looking at inputs and outputs is a
better way
ows reorgs to happen within frakenblocks, and still provides the
majority of the efficiency benefit.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese
nels around forever.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/ignopeverell/grin/blob/master/doc/chainsync.md
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> More help
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:42:14PM +, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> Pieter Wuille in particular has stressed to me what a great feature of MW it
> is
> that everything looks the same, and that breaking this property should be
> taken
> very seriously.
>
In this lin
n zero-knowledge of p and q you prove the following statement:
n = p*q; pubkey = xG where x = base^(2^largenumber mod (p-1)(q-1))
which I don't think is likely to be a huge circuit.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.
ybody thinks
thinks this -would- actually be helpful, I'd be curious to know why.
***
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the lonelin
[0] Greg Sanders, Greg Maxwell, Tim Ruffing
[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/237.pdf
[2] http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/628
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can
we could support that form of
> contract as well.
>
> - Igno
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Andrew
ease with the number of assets. With two assets my idea
would allow only 4 denominations per asset in the same size, and the size
would increase with every additional asset the chain supported.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: htt
,
> Seamus Finnigan
>
> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> More help : htt
d.net/~mimblewimble
> > Post to : mimblewimble@lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mimblewimble
> Post to : mimblewimb
ithout even needing to argue about
whether this is a sensible use of blockchain space.
> So I'd be happy to hear others' arguments. The benefits would be tangible,
> but so would be the drawbacks.
>
> - Igno
>
> [1] https://lists.launchpad.net/mimblewimble/msg00165.html
--
Andr
etty serious confusion, and that we should avoid "quid" for
this reason.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"A goose alone, I suppose, can know the loneliness of geese
who can never find
t; bit, so you reveal "0" bit - that
> would not leak the magnitude of the amount (could be simply the padding zero
> in the high digits).
>
>
> > On 7 Sep 2017, at 11:12, Andrew Poelstra <apoels...@wpsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at
> channel tx with a locktime at L-1, then a new return transaction with L-2
> would surely make the payment channel tx now redundant ? Do you know where
> Im going wrong with this thinking ?
>
> [1] https://lists.launchpad.net/mimblewimble/msg00047.html
>
--
Andrew Poelstra
hanks,
> Tim Wilson
>
"Given how vitriolic the Bitcoin community is, I think we should also have
a witchhunt against the moderators of r/bitcoin."
Please no.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftwar
18 matches
Mail list logo
