On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Stephen Ford wrote:
I just got done talking with an engineer from a spam
filter company that mentioned there is a way for uri's
to be saved to the local caching dns so the next
lookup will be local. I just thought having a local
dns would do that. Did I miss something in
Quoting Tomasz Ostrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, David F. Skoll wrote:
*** NOTE INCOMPATIBILITY *** filter_begin NOW TAKES ONE ARGUMENT,
NOT ZERO. IF YOUR FILTER HAS A
PROTOTYPE FOR
Kris Deugau wrote:
define(`confQUEUE_LA', `2')dnl
define(`confREFUSE_LA', `7')dnl
Bad settings.
Having REFUSE_LA higher than QUEUE_LA is a surefire way to kill your server.
Most busy SMTP servers are I/O bound, and running in queue-only mode does
nothing to reduce your I/O load. In fact, it
This is really an academic question, but would it be possible to
scan/compile the mimedefang filter before including and adjust the
prototype declaration and use accordingly? (This more a Perl question
than a suggestion.) - Gary
___
NOTE: If there
From:David F. Skoll
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 8:58 AM
Kris Deugau wrote:
define(`confQUEUE_LA', `2')dnl
define(`confREFUSE_LA', `7')dnl
Bad settings.
Having REFUSE_LA higher than QUEUE_LA is a surefire way to kill
your server.
Some handy tuning/debugging tips:
David F. Skoll wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
define(`confQUEUE_LA', `2')dnl
define(`confREFUSE_LA', `7')dnl
Bad settings.
Having REFUSE_LA higher than QUEUE_LA is a surefire way to kill your server.
Most busy SMTP servers are I/O bound, and running in queue-only mode does
nothing to reduce
Apparently, they're not running a very tight ship. I'm seeing:
Jan 15 15:16:04 mail sendmail[17255]: NOQUEUE: connect from
cernmx08.cern.ch [137.138.166.172]
Jan 15 15:16:04 mail sendmail[17255]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5
ANONYMOUS
CRAM-MD5, allowed mech=EXTERNAL GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS handshake
problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not thinking it's
me.
Thoughts?
-Ben
Ben Kamen wrote:
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS
handshake problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not thinking
it's me.
I have seen this issue
Gary Funck wrote:
This is really an academic question, but would it be possible to
scan/compile the mimedefang filter before including and adjust the
prototype declaration and use accordingly?
It is possible with Perl source filters.
It is not a good idea, though. Silently hiding bugs by
David F. Skoll wrote:
That's correct. Damian Conway in Perl Best Practices says Don't
use Prototypes, so we're gradually moving to the prototypeless
version.
I suppose an equivalent method would be to prototype everything with (@)
Too bad, I like the idea of strong prototyping :(
--
John Barton wrote:
Ben Kamen wrote:
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to
Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS
handshake problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not
thinking it's me.
I
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:57:56AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
define(`confQUEUE_LA', `2')dnl
define(`confREFUSE_LA', `7')dnl
Bad settings.
Having REFUSE_LA higher than QUEUE_LA is a surefire way to kill your server.
Most busy SMTP servers are I/O bound, and running in queue-only mode
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:33:59PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
Gary Funck wrote:
This is really an academic question, but would it be possible to
scan/compile the mimedefang filter before including and adjust the
prototype declaration and use accordingly?
It is possible with Perl
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
The original poster also mentioned:
define(`confDELAY_LA', `2')dnl
Ouch. It might be instructive to read some sendmail source that is
related to DelayLA... sendmail not only delays for one second after
each command, but also sleeps N seconds before accept()ing each
...spam e-mails coming from an e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] where the domain
name is generally has the word 'deluxe', 'luxury', or some form thereof
in it? Over the past few days I've gotten hundreds upon hundreds of
hits from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Working on adding filter_helo support...
Hmmm... I'm looking at MXRelayOK, MXSenderOK, MXRecipientOK, etc.
and wondering about why there's duplication of both passing the same
arguments
again (ip, name, helo, etc)... As well as duplicating the validation
logic for
arguments...
Inquiring
Quick question...
I was wondering about moving the:
write_mx_command(data-cmdFD, 'E', (unsigned char *) data-heloArg);
into the helo() function from envfrom() instead... but I'm not sure at
what point
the file is opened and can be written to... currently that happens in
envfrom()
too,
18 matches
Mail list logo
