[Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread -ray
All, Is there a way to change the port number that sendmail's dnsbl and endnsbl features use? I run a local rbldnsd server and rsync some blacklists. I want to know which list rejected an IP, so cant just have one FEATURE(`dnsbl') in sendmail.mc. Rather than having to bind a separate IP

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread WBrown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2006 11:13:12 AM: All, Is there a way to change the port number that sendmail's dnsbl and endnsbl features use? I run a local rbldnsd server and rsync some blacklists. I want to know which list rejected an IP, so cant just have one FEATURE(`dnsbl')

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread -ray
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you going to log and/or add to each message's header or will you be checking it manually if there is a question? If the latter, use something like the spam database lookup at http://dnsstuff.com No it will be logged. I have a script that runs

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread WBrown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2006 11:34:19 AM: No it will be logged. I have a script that runs through the maillog and makes some rrdtool graphs, and i want stats on the number of hits for each rbl. So i need sendmail to log a different entry for each rbl. You might research how

Re: [Mimedefang] Wiki updates

2006-04-07 Thread Philip Prindeville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else have any comments about the example or the strategy? Very nice. If anyone ends up using it, and/or making improvements on it, please report your experience to me or the list. Thanks. ___ NOTE: If there

OT - Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
- Original Message - From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Great idea but unfeasible. In Virginia, this would be considered malicious programming and probably computer trespass as well :-( I used to live in Virginia and I don't miss that place. I cringe even

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:23, John Nemeth wrote: The flip side to this is that the day when people are held responsible for not securing their servers and allowing them to be used to attack others is probably not very far off. I can see this be similar to attractive nuisance laws. I