Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-05 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, David F. Skoll wrote: Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF, they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all

[Mimedefang] User Bayesian Setup

2006-11-05 Thread mimedefang-admin
I have a question I think I know the answer too, I just thought I would throw it out to the list for ideas. I am looking to allow users to maintain their own Bayesian scores through either SpamAssassin or DSPAM. I currently have the following configuration: Sendmail 8.13.7 SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (u

Re: [Mimedefang] Reading/writing XML config files

2006-11-05 Thread Jason Gurtz
On 11/5/2006 16:15, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Anyone else have anything to add to this? Hmm, there's the mother, XML::LibXML, but it might be a more robust solution than you're looking for. ~Jason -- ___ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-05 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:09 PM -0500 "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF, they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-05 Thread David F. Skoll
Rich West wrote: > I know this is now off-topic from the list, and I don't mean to rock the > boat any, but that is a pretty weak excuse. There has to be more to it > than some idiot's broken email server that drove you that decision. Yes. So it turns out the salesperson in question deleted the

Re: [Mimedefang] Reading/writing XML config files

2006-11-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 15:15, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > >Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem. > > > Anyone else have anything to add to this? There are 2 advantages of xml. One is that you can use a generic parser even in languages that are strongly typed

Re: [Mimedefang] Reading/writing XML config files

2006-11-05 Thread andrew fresh
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:15:12PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > David F. Skoll wrote: > >Philip Prindeville wrote: > >>Any recommendations? > > > >Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem. > > Anyone else have anything to add to this? I have used XML::Simple fr

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-05 Thread Rich West
David F. Skoll wrote: Apparently, an e-mail someone sent from within our network (ie, it had an SPF "pass") was bounced by a broken server because of SPF. That was the final straw. I know this is now off-topic from the list, and I don't mean to rock the boat any, but that is a pretty weak exc

Re: [Mimedefang] Reading/writing XML config files

2006-11-05 Thread Rob MacGregor
On 11/5/06, Philip Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone else have anything to add to this? If it ain't broke, don't fix it... Personally, I hate XML config files, I'd much rather human readable ones and *I* can understand and hand edit. I don't want to be reliant upon some GUI or co

Re: [Mimedefang] Reading/writing XML config files

2006-11-05 Thread Philip Prindeville
David F. Skoll wrote: >Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > >>Any recommendations? >> >> > >Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem. > >Regards, > >David. > > Anyone else have anything to add to this? -Philip ___ NOT