-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, David F. Skoll wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the
envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF,
they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all
I have a question I think I know the answer too, I just thought I would throw it
out to the list for ideas.
I am looking to allow users to maintain their own Bayesian scores through either
SpamAssassin or DSPAM.
I currently have the following configuration:
Sendmail 8.13.7
SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (u
On 11/5/2006 16:15, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Anyone else have anything to add to this?
Hmm, there's the mother, XML::LibXML, but it might be a more robust
solution than you're looking for.
~Jason
--
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal
--On Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:09 PM -0500 "David F. Skoll"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the
envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF,
they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all
Rich West wrote:
> I know this is now off-topic from the list, and I don't mean to rock the
> boat any, but that is a pretty weak excuse. There has to be more to it
> than some idiot's broken email server that drove you that decision.
Yes. So it turns out the salesperson in question deleted the
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 15:15, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >
> >Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
> >
> Anyone else have anything to add to this?
There are 2 advantages of xml. One is that you can use a
generic parser even in languages that are strongly typed
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:15:12PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> David F. Skoll wrote:
> >Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >>Any recommendations?
> >
> >Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
>
> Anyone else have anything to add to this?
I have used XML::Simple fr
David F. Skoll wrote:
Apparently, an e-mail someone sent from within our network (ie, it
had an SPF "pass") was bounced by a broken server because of SPF. That
was the final straw.
I know this is now off-topic from the list, and I don't mean to rock the
boat any, but that is a pretty weak exc
On 11/5/06, Philip Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it...
Personally, I hate XML config files, I'd much rather human readable
ones and *I* can understand and hand edit. I don't want to be reliant
upon some GUI or co
David F. Skoll wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>Any recommendations?
>>
>>
>
>Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
>
>Regards,
>
>David.
>
>
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
-Philip
___
NOT
10 matches
Mail list logo