--On Thursday, April 20, 2006 0:00 +0200 Jan Pieter Cornet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 03:34:19PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
But since I'm submitting on port 465 with authentication, and
not on port 25... it doesn't make sense to make certain blanket
tests that
I've been thinking about this issue some more, and was
wondering...
Would it be easier to have to sendmail instances, one that
listens on 465 for authenticated email only, and then requeues
it locally by passing it onto the primary instance of sendmail,
which would apply mimedefang+spamassassin
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Would it be easier to have to sendmail instances, one that
listens on 465 for authenticated email only
587 would be the canonical port, but yes...
and then requeues it locally by passing it onto the primary
instance of sendmail, which would apply
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 03:34:19PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
But since I'm submitting on port 465 with authentication, and
not on port 25... it doesn't make sense to make certain blanket
tests that would be applied to all outside mail.
What I do in this case is make some tests optional
Hi.
I'm submitting from a host behind a NATed gateway, so the
address that my machine things it is using when it says HELO [x.x.x.x.x]
if different from that which my local server is seeing.
The problem is that we check for address spoofing as a basic sanity
test... and it's failing (of
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'm submitting from a host behind a NATed gateway, so the
address that my machine things it is using when it says HELO
[x.x.x.x.x] if different from that which my local server is seeing.
Hmmm... I would say if at least one of the apparent or HELO IPs is private,
6 matches
Mail list logo
