Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RFC: How shall we plan releases of new major versions?

2012-11-06 Thread JonY
On 11/5/2012 21:31, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: 2012/11/5 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net On 11/5/2012 21:16, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: 2012/11/5 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net On 11/5/2012 20:44, Ozkan Sezer wrote: If older gcc (I guess 4.6 is common as the old gcc) is OK with it, then

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in gcc? dereferencing pointers to iterators

2012-11-06 Thread Jim Michaels
somehow I think pointers are the way to go when modifying an iterator function argument.  but I am having problems. I have a pointer to an iterator. gcc wants me to dereference a *third* time. it says to use - and I know a-b is the same as *a.b but gcc doesn't see it this way I guess.  or

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Error building python extension (DLL load failed: invalid access to memory location)

2012-11-06 Thread Václav Šmilauer
I'm hoping my load fail (and the OP's) turns out to be the issue of modules linking against two different CRT versions. PeStudio tells me my msvcrt.dll linked .pyd's try to use _errno, __dllonexit, fflush, free, malloc, and strcmp from msvcr90.dll. Just for the heck of it, I changed

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MinWG64 on Windows, for Windows?

2012-11-06 Thread Jim Michaels
that would be nice... From: Yves yves.per...@modusfx.com To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MinWG64 on Windows, for Windows? Hi Ruben, 

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in gcc? dereferencing pointers to iterators

2012-11-06 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
Op 6 nov. 2012 11:04 schreef Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com het volgende: somehow I think pointers are the way to go when modifying an iterator function argument. but I am having problems. I have a pointer to an iterator. An iterator is the generalization of pointers for non-sequential

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Error building python extension (DLL load failed: invalid access to memory location)

2012-11-06 Thread Václav Šmilauer
I'm hoping my load fail (and the OP's) turns out to be the issue of modules linking against two different CRT versions. PeStudio tells me my msvcrt.dll linked .pyd's try to use _errno, __dllonexit, fflush, free, malloc, and strcmp from msvcr90.dll. Just for the heck of it, I changed

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RFC: How shall we plan releases of new major versions?

2012-11-06 Thread JonY
On 11/6/2012 16:57, JonY wrote: Actually, according to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/28d5ce15%28v=vs.80%29.aspx In Visual C++ 2005, vswprintf conforms to the ISO C Standard, which requires the second parameter, count, of type size_t. To force the old nonstandard behavior, define

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MinWG64 on Windows, for Windows?

2012-11-06 Thread Zouzou
With this in mind, which package should I use to compile on Windows for Linux? You probably see it coming… which package should I use to compile on Windows for MacOSX? In another words, what solution is there to cross compile on Windows, for Windows, Linux and

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MinWG64 on Windows, for Windows?

2012-11-06 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Zouzou wrote: With this in mind, which package should I use to compile on Windows for Linux? You probably see it coming… which package should I use to compile on Windows for MacOSX? In another words, what solution is there to cross compile

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Error building python extension (DLL load failed: invalid access to memory location)

2012-11-06 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu wrote: I'm hoping my load fail (and the OP's) turns out to be the issue of modules linking against two different CRT versions. PeStudio tells me my msvcrt.dll linked .pyd's try to use _errno, __dllonexit, fflush, free, malloc, and

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in gcc? dereferencing pointers to iterators

2012-11-06 Thread K. Frank
Hi Jim! A gentle suggestion ... On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com wrote: somehow I think pointers are the way to go when modifying an iterator function argument. but I am having problems. I have a pointer to an iterator. ... Many (by no means all) of your

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in gcc? dereferencing pointers to iterators

2012-11-06 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, K. Frank wrote: Hi Jim! A gentle suggestion ... Oh, don't be too gentle. ;D On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Jim Michaels wrote: somehow I think pointers are the way to go when modifying an iterator function argument. but I am having problems. I have a

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in gcc? dereferencing pointers to iterators

2012-11-06 Thread Ruben Van Boxem
2012/11/6 Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, K. Frank wrote: Hi Jim! A gentle suggestion ... Oh, don't be too gentle. ;D On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Jim Michaels wrote: somehow I think pointers are the way to go when modifying an iterator