Hi there,
The qt-project and Digia just released Qt 5.0.1 binary installer for MinGW!
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/01/31/qt-5-0-1-released/
The binary is compiled with and comes with the
x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8.7z toolchain from MinGW-builds. Quite a lot
of you have been
2013/1/31 Koehne Kai:
Hi there,
The qt-project and Digia just released Qt 5.0.1 binary installer for MinGW!
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/01/31/qt-5-0-1-released/
The binary is compiled with and comes with the
x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8.7z toolchain from MinGW-builds. Quite a
-Original Message-
From: niXman [mailto:i.nix...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:05 PM
To: Koehne Kai; mingwbuilds-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; Mingw-w64-
pub...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-
builds toolchain
2013/1/31 Koehne Kai:
the difference is actually in the debugging info: E.g. Qt5Guid.dll for MinGW
is a 131 MB big, while MSVC Qt5Guid.dll + Qt5Guid.pdb is just 24 MB.
Wow оО
Don't know whether the size of debugging info can be reduced somehow?
No, I don't know ..
--
Regards,
niXman
See:
http://dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF4.pdf
APPENDIX E--DWARF COMPRESSION DUPLICATE ELIMINATION (INFORMATIVE)
I've no idea what state they're in for GCC/GDB for Windows.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:31 PM, niXman i.nix...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/31 Koehne Kai:
the difference is actually in the
-Original Message-
From: niXman [mailto:i.nix...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:48 PM
To: Koehne Kai; Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net; mingwbuilds-
us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-
builds
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:31 AM, niXman wrote:
2013/1/31 Koehne Kai:
the difference is actually in the debugging info: E.g. Qt5Guid.dll for MinGW
is a 131 MB big, while MSVC Qt5Guid.dll + Qt5Guid.pdb is just 24 MB.
Wow оО
Don't know whether the size of debugging info can be reduced
The main reasons msvc generates smaller binaries in general is that it does
optimizations better than GCC currently, but hopefully that can change soon
On Jan 31, 2013 9:31 AM, niXman i.nix...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/31 Koehne Kai:
the difference is actually in the debugging info: E.g.
2013/1/31 Zach Thibeau:
The main reasons msvc generates smaller binaries in general is that it does
optimizations better than GCC currently, but hopefully that can change soon
Not much better...
Besides, the reason not in it.
--
Regards,
niXman
Have anybody done that?
I get this:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/home/solskogen/temp/ncurses-5.9/ncurses'
cd progs make DESTDIR= all
make[1]: Entering directory `/data/home/solskogen/temp/ncurses-5.9/progs'
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc ../objects/tic.o ../objects/dump_entry.o
10 matches
Mail list logo