On 06/26/13 23:57, dw wrote:
I still don't get, why we need those functions in crt.
The problem is that in MSVC it it perfectly legal to just copy/paste the
prototype for one of the intrinsics in your file and use it (see example
below). It is NOT necessary to include intrin.h. If we want
On 06/26/13 23:57, dw wrote:
I still don't get, why we need those functions in crt.
The problem is that in MSVC it it perfectly legal to just copy/paste the
prototype for one of the intrinsics in your file and use it (see example
below). It is NOT necessary to include intrin.h. If we want
Hi Rafaël,
On 06/26/13 22:53, Rafaël Carré wrote:
based on a patch by Jacek
Thanks for taking care of this!
---
mingw-w64-crt/def-include/msvcrt-common.def.in | 2 ++
mingw-w64-crt/lib32/msvcrt.def.in | 1 -
mingw-w64-crt/lib64/msvcrt.def.in | 1 -
I don't think
Hi,
Please review following patches adding support for more Direct2D stuff,
most notably its 1.1 version.
http://repo.or.cz/w/mingw-w64/jacek.git/commitdiff/f4447e79179ac9761331eb9372542cb165667230
http://repo.or.cz/w/mingw-w64/jacek.git/commitdiff/ef66da51ded4b378a9e6fa541934386cee555a9e
Le 27/06/2013 15:14, Jacek Caban a écrit :
Hi Rafaël,
On 06/26/13 22:53, Rafaël Carré wrote:
based on a patch by Jacek
Thanks for taking care of this!
---
mingw-w64-crt/def-include/msvcrt-common.def.in | 2 ++
mingw-w64-crt/lib32/msvcrt.def.in | 1 -
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
why do we need emul?
That depends on the version of MSVCRT.DLL on the users system. It is
emulated to avoid conflicts at runtime.
--
Earnie
--
Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
why do we need emul?
That depends on the version of MSVCRT.DLL on the users system. It is
emulated to avoid conflicts at
On 06/27/13 18:11, Rafaël Carré wrote:
Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
why do we need emul?
That depends on the version of MSVCRT.DLL on the users system. It
2013/6/27 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com:
On 06/27/13 18:11, Rafaël Carré wrote:
Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
why do we need emul?
That depends on the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
why do we need emul?
That depends on the version of MSVCRT.DLL on the
Le 27/06/2013 18:33, Kai Tietz a écrit :
2013/6/27 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com:
On 06/27/13 18:11, Rafaël Carré wrote:
Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
Well, that won't work well (at least
this way), but I agree we have to support it one way or another. Maybe
placing them in (almost) always included file would do the trick, but
that has other problems. That said, I'm fine with your crt solution.
I agree it won't work particularly well. If
12 matches
Mail list logo
