Ok to apply?
Kai
From 619ed15542eca39ad965def299e0ce9d69a42989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:16:52 +0200
Subject: Add winapifamily check, add support for CLUSAPI_VERSION_WINDOWS 8
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/resapi.h | 707
Ok for apply?
Kai
From be155f24d75d6325777947a7a8b0d9fab078b54e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:42:02 +0200
Subject: Add winapifamily-check, add some new REGSTR_ defines
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/regstr.h | 66
Ok for apply?
Kai
From f8ca908611fcd7c6181788ef4b1a2fd973496c67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:55:57 +0200
Subject: Add winapifamily check
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/rasdlg.h | 65 +--
1 files
Is patch ok for apply?
Kai
From 4d463ece0dcf8769e64b9afd1069331c5ddfb9f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:07:52 +0200
Subject: Add winapifamily check, and additional add Windows 7/8 extensions.
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/raseapif.h |
On 08/26/14 10:12, Kai Tietz wrote:
+
#define REGSTR_VAL_CLASSGUID TEXT(ClassGUID)
-#define REGSTR_VAL_INSTANCEIDENTIFIER TEXT(InstanceIdentifier)
+
+#define REGSTR_VAL_INSTANCEIDENTIFIER TEXT(InstanceIde
#define REGSTR_VAL_DUPLICATEOF TEXT(DuplicateOf)
#define REGSTR_VAL_STATUSFLAGS
Huh, in that patch I see
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
/**
- * This file has no copyright assigned and is placed in the Public Domain.
* This file is part of the mingw-w64 runtime package.
- * No warranty is given; refer to the file DISCLAIMER.PD within this package.
+ * No warranty is given; refer to the
Ok for apply?
Regards,
Kai
From 9653e437d1d34caccf2d79aa567637b239b7e152 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:14:02 +0200
Subject: Add new shldisp.idl
---
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.am |1 +
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.in
Raffaello D. Di Napoli
fasti...@gmail.com writes:
2014-08-25 11:25 GMT-04:00 Óscar Fuentes o...@wanadoo.es:
On a CPU-intensive application, the 64 bit exe runs 40% slower than
its 32 bit counterpart. It's a C++ app with a workload typical of a
compiler.
Are there known slow spots on the 64
Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com writes:
Are there known slow spots on the 64 bit runtimes?
Well, there might be some. I can't actual confirm this finding in
general. The load you see is often application-specific.
I know about a lot of application, which are actual about 30% faster
on
