For the parts that are "working around a compiler bug":
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
- If the bug has been fixed, what about using __GNUC__ and
__GNUC_MINOR__ to limit the code?
dw
On 9/18/2014 3:23 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
Please review, i'll commit it, just
Looks ok. Please apply
Thanks,
Kai
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Mingw
Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK.
v2 adds llrint functions, removes hidden attribute
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am b/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
index 7245956..9731aa9 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ src_libmingwe
Patch looks ok, but a the use of '__attribute__((visibility
("hidden")))'. Actually the visibility stuff isn't supported by
pe-coff, so is it really necessary here?
Kai
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matte
Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK.
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am b/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
index 7245956..9731aa9 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ src_libmingwex=\
math/fabs.c math/fabsf.c mat
