[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in ntsecapi.h

2021-04-26 Thread Biswapriyo Nath
From 25460572ab90c9028c1225a4570c343ce89b6435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Biswapriyo Nath Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 01:55:20 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in ntsecapi.h Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath --- mingw-w64-headers/include/ntsecapi.h | 185

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Increase precision of gettimeofday() if possible.

2021-04-26 Thread Christian Franke
Liu Hao wrote: 在 2021-04-22 20:35, Christian Franke 写道: This patch significantly increases the precision of gettimeofday() on Windows 8 or later. It is then similar to Cygwin or Linux. It also affects C++11 std::chrono:*_clock as _GLIBCXX_USE_GETTIMEOFDAY is defined but not

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] headers: Add missing values in winerror.h

2021-04-26 Thread Liu Hao
在 2021-04-26 03:22, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add missing values in winerror.h Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath --- mingw-w64-headers/include/winerror.h | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) Thanks. This patch looks good to me. I pushed it. -- Best regards,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt/stdlib: Add `quick_exit()` and `at_quick_exit()` for UCRT

2021-04-26 Thread Liu Hao
在 2021-04-24 01:08, Christoph Reiter 写道: Someone reported a build error using this commit with the logs referencing quick_exit(). Could this be related? I have bootstrapped GCC with UCRT successfully with this commit [1], so I don't think this commit caused the error. [1]

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Increase precision of gettimeofday() if possible.

2021-04-26 Thread Liu Hao
在 2021-04-22 20:35, Christian Franke 写道: This patch significantly increases the precision of gettimeofday() on Windows 8 or later. It is then similar to Cygwin or Linux. It also affects C++11 std::chrono:*_clock as _GLIBCXX_USE_GETTIMEOFDAY is defined but not _GLIBCXX_USE_CLOCK_*. A similar

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Implement `at_quick_exit()`

2021-04-26 Thread Liu Hao
在 2021-04-26 04:20, Martin Storsjö 写道: The exact behaviour for cases 3-5 differ between whether the two are linked dynamically or statically against the CRT. I'm not sure if all the nuances are worth mimicing though. (A function registered with at_quick_exit within the DLL isn't called when