vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
2015-03-18 16:28 GMT+01:00 Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com
:
On 3/17/2015 11:27 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote:
I think I am bumping into the issue described here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16598. The bug also
has a
patch attached
Hi,
I think I am bumping into the issue described here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16598. The bug also has a
patch attached. What would it take to get someone to merge it?
Vadim
--
Dive into the
Hi,
Is link-time dead code elimination via --function-sections +
-Wl,--gc-sections known to work on mingw?
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your
I've tried both patches (fixed conditions in Kai's) and both eliminate
extraneous calls to VirtualProtect. However Kai's patch did not seem to
affect startup performance at all. DW's patch, on the other hand, also
gets rid of VirtualQuery', and that cuts down the startup time of my test
example
this, but you have the setup to test it anyway. Also,
this code snippet only fixes 2 of the 3 places that use
PAGE_EXECUTE_WRITECOPY. Remember to change the comparison in
mark_section_writable() as well.
FWIW,
dw
On 8/15/2014 8:17 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote:
Okay, I was wrong about
Hi,
I am trying to figure out the cause of a slow application startup, and the
evidence I have so far, points to mingw's _pei386_runtime_relocator()
routine as the culprit. When I start my app under debugger, I see this
function calling VirtualProtect() about a zillion times in a row.
Looking
