On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 10/02/2017 10:52 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 10/02/2017 05:55 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 10/02/2017 10:52 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 10/02/2017 05:55 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in
On 10/02/2017 10:52 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
>
>> On 10/02/2017 05:55 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>>
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in should be almost
identical
to
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 10/02/2017 05:55 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in should be almost identical
to what it was before, except for some new *_dbg and __p_* functions.
The
On 10/02/2017 05:55 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
>> Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in should be almost identical
>> to what it was before, except for some new *_dbg and __p_* functions.
>>
>> The functions that were included for 32 and 64
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in should be almost identical
to what it was before, except for some new *_dbg and __p_* functions.
The functions that were included for 32 and 64 bit x86 in the unification
were originally believed to be
Now the output from the unified msvcrt.def.in should be almost identical
to what it was before, except for some new *_dbg and __p_* functions.
The functions that were included for 32 and 64 bit x86 in the unification
were originally believed to be harmless, but some of them turned out to
be
