On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Martin,
This patch looks right to me. If it never really worked, backward
compatibility is not an issue. If someone wants those features, using UCRT
seems to be the right answer.
Ok - if there's no objections to it, I'd go ahead and push this one
Hi Martin,
This patch looks right to me. If it never really worked, backward
compatibility is not an issue. If someone wants those features, using
UCRT seems to be the right answer.
Thanks,
Jacek
On 22.04.2020 23:00, Martin Storsjö wrote:
This was a partial (but incomplete!) support for
This was a partial (but incomplete!) support for the MSVC stack
cookie handling (under the MSVC option /GS, similar to GCC and
Clang/MinGW's -fstack-protector-strong). This contained the
stack cookie itself and the init function, and the error reporting
function, but not the checking function