Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] for missing voids

2016-08-22 Thread Kai Tietz
2016-08-22 8:43 GMT+02:00 David Wohlferd : > On 8/21/2016 11:17 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, David Wohlferd wrote: >> >>> To my surprise, these two statements have (slightly) different meanings: >>> >>> STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (); >>>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] for missing voids

2016-08-22 Thread David Wohlferd
On 8/21/2016 11:17 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, David Wohlferd wrote: > >> To my surprise, these two statements have (slightly) different meanings: >> >> STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (); >> STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (void); >> >> And clang complains about

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] for missing voids

2016-08-22 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, David Wohlferd wrote: > To my surprise, these two statements have (slightly) different meanings: > > STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (); > STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (void); > > And clang complains about it (warning: function with no prototype cannot use >

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] for missing voids

2016-08-21 Thread David Wohlferd
To my surprise, these two statements have (slightly) different meanings: STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (); STDAPI MFUnregisterPlatformFromMMCSS (void); And clang complains about it (warning: function with no prototype cannot use the stdcall calling convention). I have added 'void'