On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 09/29/2017 08:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Previously, the ifdefs were misplaced, leading to this function not
being defined at all if building with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1.
If targeting ucrtbase.dll, we always need to rely on the
On 09/29/2017 08:48 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> Previously, the ifdefs were misplaced, leading to this function not
> being defined at all if building with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1.
>
> If targeting ucrtbase.dll, we always need to rely on the
> __stdio_common_vsprintf implementation, since
Previously, the ifdefs were misplaced, leading to this function not
being defined at all if building with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1.
If targeting ucrtbase.dll, we always need to rely on the
__stdio_common_vsprintf implementation, since _vscprintf doesn't
exist in ucrtbase.dll, regardless of the
