Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/6] string_s.h/wchar_s.h: Added wcsnlen_s implementation.

2014-08-20 Thread NAKAI Yuta
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:53:11 +0200 From: ja...@codeweavers.com To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/6] string_s.h/wchar_s.h: Added wcsnlen_s implementation. OK, I pushed it with extern inline

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/6] string_s.h/wchar_s.h: Added wcsnlen_s implementation.

2014-08-19 Thread Jacek Caban
--- mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h | 3 +++ mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/wchar_s.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h index 34d1c99..4b10820 100644 ---

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/6] string_s.h/wchar_s.h: Added wcsnlen_s implementation.

2014-08-19 Thread Kai Tietz
Hmm, this patch looks to me not 100% ok. Making functions static inline seems to be not the proper thing to do here AFAICS. This will lead to warning for cases those functions aren't used. So I would think that attribute unused is missing here. Additionally the 'inline' looks to me bogus.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/6] string_s.h/wchar_s.h: Added wcsnlen_s implementation.

2014-08-19 Thread Jacek Caban
OK, I pushed it with extern inline declaration. Thanks for reviews, Jacek On 08/19/14 15:38, Kai Tietz wrote: Hmm, this patch looks to me not 100% ok. Making functions static inline seems to be not the proper thing to do here AFAICS. This will lead to warning for cases those functions