On Mon, 6 May 2019, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 5/6/19 1:10 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Martin,
All patches look good to me.
Thanks! So you agree that it should practically be safe to change the value
of this define and very few external users should be
On 5/6/19 1:10 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Martin,
All patches look good to me.
Thanks! So you agree that it should practically be safe to change the
value of this define and very few external users should be hit by the
change? (In practice I have
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Martin,
All patches look good to me.
Thanks! So you agree that it should practically be safe to change the
value of this define and very few external users should be hit by the
change? (In practice I have only recently added such checks in one
Hi Martin,
All patches look good to me.
Thanks,
Jacek
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
This tries to maintain backwards compatibility of enabling UCRT if
either 0xE00 or 0x1400 is specified, but will break user code that
check the value of __MSVCRT_VERSION__ >= 0x1400.
This tries to correct the historical mistake in how the higher values of
this constant is defined, before it goes