Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [RFC] Removing CE from build system

2014-05-28 Thread André Hentschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 27.05.2014 07:28, schrieb Vincent Torri: i was the one who ported the EFL (set of graphic libs) to Windows CE and I plan to remove that port. Nowadays, Windows CE is dead and the guys who worked on CEgcc (the Win CE port of gcc) has given up. So

[Mingw-w64-public] [RFC] Removing CE from build system

2014-05-26 Thread André Hentschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, After doing the ARM32 build system changes i figured it would be good to get rid of the CE stuff in the build system. And yes, i think we should keep the def files in libce for reference, even if git won't forget it... The non-autogenerated

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [RFC] Removing CE from build system

2014-05-26 Thread Kai Tietz
My 5 cents. I would vote for removing libce stuff. Actually it doesn't work, and I don't think somebody actually uses it, or intends to make it working. Nevertheless it is just my opinion. So if I am wrong about that please point out your objections for removing it. Kai

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [RFC] Removing CE from build system

2014-05-26 Thread Vincent Torri
i was the one who ported the EFL (set of graphic libs) to Windows CE and I plan to remove that port. Nowadays, Windows CE is dead and the guys who worked on CEgcc (the Win CE port of gcc) has given up. So no problem for me if you remove it. I would really prefer that people work on Win Phone 8