Re: [Mingw-w64-public] FW: Mail delivery failed: returning message to

2008-07-30 Thread Kai Tietz
>Hi, > > [Sorry for the messed up subject line, but I guess I'll better > continue with it rather than starting a new thread ...] > > > > Something different: > > > Why are there both > > > /home/mingw-w64/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/include/float.h > > > /home/mingw-w64/x86_64-

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] FW: Mail delivery failed: returning message to

2008-07-30 Thread Stefan . Neis
Hi, [Sorry for the messed up subject line, but I guess I'll better continue with it rather than starting a new thread ...] > > Something different: > > Why are there both > > /home/mingw-w64/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/include/float.h > > /home/mingw-w64/x86_64-pc-mingw32/include

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] FW: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2008-07-29 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi Stefan, > > I agree that the declaration of alarm is a way "not telling truth" > > here, but I found some applications, which are dependent to > > such a "not honest" way. > > I find it surprising that they actually work with such a trick, but > there always are interesting surprises in porti

[Mingw-w64-public] FW: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2008-07-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again, > I agree that the declaration of alarm is a way "not telling truth" > here, but I found some applications, which are dependent to > such a "not honest" way. I find it surprising that they actually work with such a trick, but there always are interesting surprises in porting ...