Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least problematic.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 13:26 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com: On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com: On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com: On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com: On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-05 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least problematic. Looking deeper at this, current implementation has one more problem. We can't really have

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-05 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least problematic. Looking deeper at this, current

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-04 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Erik, On 03/01/15 23:24, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Sandro Mani schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 22:24 [+0100]: mingw-poppler-0.28.1-1 ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild ** Package owner: smani Time to build: 2 minutes, 25 seconds Build

[Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
This is a report for the 20150103 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which have been applied since the previous mass rebuild. During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used: * mingw-w64 git f7337b 20141222 trunk snapshot *

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 20:43 [+0100]: The following packages FAILED to rebuild: mingw-cairo-1.14.0-1 ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild ** Package owner: rjones Time to build: 1 minute, 32 seconds

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread LRN
On 03.01.2015 23:07, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Erik van Pienbroek schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 20:43 [+0100]: mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.34-3 ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild ** Package owner: mooninite Time to build: 9 seconds

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/03/2015 01:43 PM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.34-3 ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild ** Package owner: mooninite Time to build: 9 seconds Build