Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-10-03 Thread Adrien Nader
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 10/2/2016 6:38 PM, JonY wrote: > >On 10/3/2016 06:37, David Wohlferd wrote: > >>So, my testing didn't turn up any problems. The patch is pretty > >>big (1,389,398), so I have compressed it and uploaded it to >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-10-03 Thread David Wohlferd
On 10/2/2016 6:38 PM, JonY wrote: On 10/3/2016 06:37, David Wohlferd wrote: So, my testing didn't turn up any problems. The patch is pretty big (1,389,398), so I have compressed it and uploaded it to http://www.LimeGreenSocks.com/gen2.7z (where it is only 82,083). Just a reminder: Despite the

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-10-02 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/3/2016 06:37, David Wohlferd wrote: > > So, my testing didn't turn up any problems. The patch is pretty > big (1,389,398), so I have compressed it and uploaded it to > http://www.LimeGreenSocks.com/gen2.7z (where it is only 82,083). > >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-10-02 Thread David Wohlferd
On 10/1/2016 4:37 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 9/24/2016 7:23 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: >> On 9/24/2016 4:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Sep 23, 2016 8:08 PM, "David Wohlferd" >>> wrote: Ok. With that change in place, I have run autoreconf -fiv

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-10-01 Thread David Wohlferd
On 9/24/2016 7:23 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 9/24/2016 4:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2016 8:08 PM, "David Wohlferd" wrote: >>> Ok. With that change in place, I have run >>>autoreconf -fiv >>> >>> in the root directory of mingw-w64. That

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-24 Thread David Wohlferd
On 9/24/2016 4:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Sep 23, 2016 8:08 PM, "David Wohlferd" wrote: >> On 9/23/2016 5:08 AM, JonY wrote: >>> On 9/23/2016 09:50, David Wohlferd wrote: On 9/22/2016 5:53 AM, JonY wrote: > On 9/22/2016 20:23, JonY wrote: >> just remove

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-24 Thread NightStrike
On Sep 23, 2016 8:08 PM, "David Wohlferd" wrote: > > On 9/23/2016 5:08 AM, JonY wrote: > > On 9/23/2016 09:50, David Wohlferd wrote: > >> On 9/22/2016 5:53 AM, JonY wrote: > >>> On 9/22/2016 20:23, JonY wrote: > just remove the mpdecimal directory, the dfp/*.c stuff

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-23 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/23/2016 09:50, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 9/22/2016 5:53 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 9/22/2016 20:23, JonY wrote: >>> just remove the mpdecimal directory, the dfp/*.c stuff should >>> still work, likewise for the pformat.c changes. I'm doing just

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-22 Thread David Wohlferd
On 9/22/2016 5:53 AM, JonY wrote: > On 9/22/2016 20:23, JonY wrote: >> just remove the mpdecimal directory, the dfp/*.c stuff should >> still work, likewise for the pformat.c changes. I'm doing just that >> since yesterday, running build tests. SF ate my GPG signed mail. >> >> Use format-patch -D

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-22 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/22/2016 20:23, JonY wrote: > > just remove the mpdecimal directory, the dfp/*.c stuff should > still work, likewise for the pformat.c changes. I'm doing just that > since yesterday, running build tests. SF ate my GPG signed mail. > > Use

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-22 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/22/2016 07:15, David Wohlferd wrote: > > Creating patches that delete files makes for REALLY big patches. > Instead of me emailing the 8MB file, just pretend that the attached > file also deletes the entire mingw-w64-crt/math/DFP/mpdecimal >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-21 Thread David Wohlferd
On 9/20/2016 3:39 PM, David Wohlferd wrote: On 9/20/2016 3:01 AM, JonY wrote: On 9/20/2016 14:29, David Wohlferd wrote: 1) The paths for the math/DFP stuff are totally messed up. Directory names include a version number (2.3) which our tree has removed, some directory names have changed

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-20 Thread David Wohlferd
On 9/20/2016 3:01 AM, JonY wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/20/2016 14:29, David Wohlferd wrote: 1) The paths for the math/DFP stuff are totally messed up. Directory names include a version number (2.3) which our tree has removed, some directory names have changed

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-09-20 Thread David Wohlferd
On 8/12/2016 5:34 AM, NightStrike wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:05 AM, dw wrote: I have been told that "autoreconf -fiv" regenerates all the files using the current version. But after seeing the dozen files it changed and realizing I didn't actually know what any

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-08-11 Thread dw
>> Since I need to regenerate Makefile.in, I need to decide what to do: > Make one commit that updates aclocal to v1.15. Committed and pushed. > Make a second commit that > applies your desired changes to both Makefile.am and Makefile.in. Committed and pushed. >> Hopefully someone who knows

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-08-10 Thread NightStrike
On Aug 10, 2016 5:44 PM, "dw" wrote: > > The checked-in mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.in was generated with 1.15. > However the associated aclocal.m4 is generated with 1.14.1. I don't > know much about the build files, but is mixing and matching like this a > good idea? Nope

[Mingw-w64-public] aclocal.m4 and Makefile.am out of sync

2016-08-10 Thread dw
The checked-in mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.in was generated with 1.15. However the associated aclocal.m4 is generated with 1.14.1. I don't know much about the build files, but is mixing and matching like this a good idea? Since I need to regenerate Makefile.in, I need to decide what to do: a) I