On 12/2/2012 12:55, Jon wrote:
However, if you choose to use autotools, to better support the
build-for-windows-on-windows scenario I ask that you also maintain a
mingw32-make compatible Makefile. IIRC, this was Ozkan's suggestion near
the very beginning of the discussion.
Do you mean by
This is intriguing. Can you give some detail on how it works for
cross compiling?
xml file definition regarding libraries and executables exists in
*.bkl files(similar to ant), bakefile will generate the makefiles from
*.bkl files for specific make tools.
It works perfectly in wxWidgets.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, NightStrike wrote:
Really, I haven't seen any build system that I think is wonderful.
autotools works for us, but it's not great. I've used a lot... even
scons.
just for curiosity : what do you think of
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It's not something
esoteric.
As far as
On 12/2/2012 06:27, Jon wrote:
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It's not something
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It's not something
esoteric.
As far as
However, if you choose to use autotools, to better support the
build-for-windows-on-windows scenario I ask that you also maintain a
mingw32-make compatible Makefile. IIRC, this was Ozkan's suggestion near
the very beginning of the discussion.
Do you mean by this not msys ?
Yes.
I
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Zouzou inter...@123gen.com wrote:
On 30/11/12 15:29, NightStrike wrote:
In the autotools world, there is a very defined and extremely enforced
concept that above all, our goal is to make it *TRIVIAL* for the end
user to compile your software. Now let's clarify
Hello,
As I know, wxWidgets uses bakefile(http://www.bakefile.org/index.html)
system. Probably, bakefile is good for cross building of Makefiles for
nmake,mingw-make,make etc.
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
On 12/1/2012 06:49, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
Now of course, we could
try to provide these system-specific files that cmake should be giving
us for free, but then we'd have to maintain (thus somehow be able to
test) every conceivable system that our users might have or want to
use.
No,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, deneme.true deneme.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As I know, wxWidgets uses bakefile(http://www.bakefile.org/index.html)
system. Probably, bakefile is good for cross building of Makefiles for
nmake,mingw-make,make etc.
This is intriguing. Can you give some
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
In the cmake world, to do the same thing, Dave has to be a lot more
knowledgeable of the internals of our project. He needs to
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, I haven't seen any build system that I think is wonderful.
autotools works for us, but it's not great. I've used a lot... even
scons.
just for curiosity : what do you think of jam or one of its
derivatives
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
concerned about
On 11/12/2012 16:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:39 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
It's unfortunate you both had bad experiences with cmake. Cmake really is
quite powerful, and recent syntax mods make it friendlier to use.
For example, I contributed the following cmake build scripts to the mruby
On 11/11/2012 15:59, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:39 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
It's unfortunate you both had bad experiences with cmake. Cmake really is
quite powerful, and recent syntax mods make it friendlier to use.
For example, I contributed
Op 11 nov. 2012 09:27 schreef JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net het
volgende:
On 11/11/2012 15:59, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:39 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
It's unfortunate you both had bad experiences with cmake. Cmake
really is quite powerful,
If I only could, I on a global scale would forbid autotools use, and I
would provide criminal punishment for violation of this prohibition =)
--
Regards,
niXman
___
Dual-target(32 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:43 AM, niXman i.nix...@gmail.com wrote:
If I only could, I on a global scale would forbid autotools use, and I
would provide criminal punishment for violation of this prohibition =)
IMHO, autotools are perfectly fine if you are on a Unix-based
operating system. The
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:26 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sounds like they are reinventing autotools.
As Ruben says, it's not the case.
The main problem with autotools is they do not support Windows. Even
with CoApp, autotools support is far from *acceptable* on Windows.
A
On 11/11/2012 16:34, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
I think he means macro and module files. Usually you distribute
Sounds like they are reinventing autotools.
Lol, no.
See the
https://github.com/mruby/mruby/blob/master/cmake/modules/IntrospectSystem.cmake
example.
Wrong. Instead of
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/11/2012 16:42, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:26 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sounds like they are reinventing autotools.
As Ruben says, it's not the case.
The main problem
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sounds like they are reinventing autotools.
Lol, no.
See the
https://github.com/mruby/mruby/blob/master/cmake/modules/IntrospectSystem.cmake
example.
How is this different from what you would to in configure.ac in
On 11/11/2012 18:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
Any decent build system needs that kind of constructs. Is the CMake
syntax a bit different from autotools'? Sure. So what? With CMake you
do exactly the same checks you did with autotools, only you may need
to consider some Windows specifics
2012/11/11 Kai Tietz:
So any help for it is most welcome. The build-system is an important
issue, but even more we need developers/reviewers of it and a lot of
support :)
I wish to take part in development/testing of this project.
Where I can get the sources?
--
Regards,
niXman
2012/11/11 niXman i.nix...@gmail.com:
2012/11/11 Kai Tietz:
So any help for it is most welcome. The build-system is an important
issue, but even more we need developers/reviewers of it and a lot of
support :)
I wish to take part in development/testing of this project.
Where I can get the
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:27 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
What were the rigidities? Maybe I can help
We need to a way to inject .a libraries with additional objects compiled
from a different step,
See add_library(OBJECT):
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
The ironCrate project has as one goal that it shall be API-compatible
to msvcr*.dll (means best providing same API as msvcr100.dll from
user-perspective. For sure I won't be able - and don't intent to make
it 100%
2012/11/11 Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
2012/11/11 niXman i.nix...@gmail.com:
2012/11/11 Kai Tietz:
So any help for it is most welcome. The build-system is an important
issue, but even more we need developers/reviewers of it and a lot of
support :)
I wish to take part in
On 11/11/2012 18:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:27 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
What were the rigidities? Maybe I can help
We need to a way to inject .a libraries with additional objects compiled
from a different step,
See add_library(OBJECT):
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:13:04 +0800
JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/11/2012 18:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:27 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
What were the rigidities? Maybe I can help
We need to a way to inject .a libraries with
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
So here's the question.
Can the method I use when cross-compiling, namely, use cmake's
`ExternalProject` module (causes cmake to run itself and generate artifacts
in a different dir) to pre-build an environment on the build
On 11/12/2012 03:36, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jon wrote:
So here's the question.
Can the method I use when cross-compiling, namely, use cmake's
`ExternalProject` module (causes cmake to run itself and generate artifacts
in a different dir) to pre-build
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:14:42 +0800
JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/12/2012 03:36, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jon wrote:
So here's the question.
Can the method I use when cross-compiling, namely, use cmake's
`ExternalProject` module
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:14 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
From what I gather, I'll need to:
1. Write an external tool/driver to do this.
2. Split into subprojects.
3. Have cmake call itself recursively.
Errr... no
1. Write a CMakeLists.txt for the compiled-to-host-platform
Hi,
I have the crazy idea to help with ironCrate.
I have written a small CMakeLists.txt file to get automated compilation
working (I know you guys favor autotools, I don't). I am running into some
issues building the source from the get-go.
I wanted to ask if I could just start trying to fix
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the crazy idea to help with ironCrate.
I have written a small CMakeLists.txt file to get automated compilation
working (I know you guys favor autotools, I don't). I am running into some
issues
On 11/10/12, Luis Lavena luislav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the crazy idea to help with ironCrate.
I have written a small CMakeLists.txt file to get automated compilation
working (I know you guys favor
2012/11/10 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On 11/10/12, Luis Lavena luislav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the crazy idea to help with ironCrate.
I have written a small CMakeLists.txt file to get
On 11/10/12, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/10 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On 11/10/12, Luis Lavena luislav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the crazy idea to help with
On 11/10/2012 23:39, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 11/10/12, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/10 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On 11/10/12, Luis Lavena luislav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:22:18 +0800
JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/10/2012 23:39, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 11/10/12, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/10 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On 11/10/12, Luis Lavena luislav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10,
On 11/11/2012 02:22, Jon wrote:
It's unfortunate you both had bad experiences with cmake. Cmake really is
quite powerful, and recent syntax mods make it friendlier to use.
For example, I contributed the following cmake build scripts to the mruby
project
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:39:26 +0800
JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/11/2012 02:22, Jon wrote:
It's unfortunate you both had bad experiences with cmake. Cmake really is
quite powerful, and recent syntax mods make it friendlier to use.
For example, I contributed the
46 matches
Mail list logo
