On 7/11/2013 11:21 PM, xunxun wrote:
-Wl,--large-address-aware is only for x86 target
Thank you. I've removed this option, since my target is x64, and the compile
completes successfully.
-David C.
--
See
2013/7/10 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe
a year ago, only to find out
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2013/7/10 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard
to answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there
that aren't already using
2013/7/11 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
1) Move these functions to intrin-impl.h:
_InterlockedIncrement16, _InterlockedDecrement16,
_InterlockedCompareExchange16, _InterlockedIncrement, _InterlockedDecrement,
_InterlockedExchange, _InterlockedExchangeAdd, _InterlockedCompareExchange,
I'm doing more work on the intrinsics. While checking to see what my
changes will affect, I noticed that
(mingw-w64-libraries\pseh\src\i386\framebased-gcchack.c) is using
__readfsdword and __writefsdword. These functions will gp fault if
called on x64.
Is this code intended to be x86
The pseh lib is 32 bit only. seh on 64 bit is different and btw supported
by gcc :)
Am 12.07.2013 20:33 schrieb dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
I'm doing more work on the intrinsics. While checking to see what my
changes will affect, I noticed that
The pseh lib is 32 bit only. seh on 64 bit is different and btw
supported by gcc :)
I was hoping you'd say that. That means I don't have to try to change
any of it.
Thanks for the info.
dw
--
See everything from
