Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Proposal for a C11 header and announcement of mcfgthread, a library that implements efficient C11 and C++11 thread support without using winpthread

> Is this set in stone, or is it foreseen to change it to a more liberal > licence? The choice of that license was an ... accident. XD XD XD Since the library is expected to be linked dynamically it shouldn't matter much. If you consider it problematic, please let me know. > Another question

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Proposal for a C11 header and announcement of mcfgthread, a library that implements efficient C11 and C++11 thread support without using winpthread

Hi, most of the mcfgthread code is LGPL licenced (MCFLicense.txt ). Is this set in stone, or is it foreseen to change it to a more liberal licence? Another question is: is it still possible to use pthreads (via winpthreads) if gcc