Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread NightStrike
On Sat, May 8, 2021, 01:28 Joachim Wuttke  wrote:

> Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
> that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
> myself culpable by recommending use of your software.
>
> What is your position on this?
>
> Kind regards and thanks for mingw-w64, Joachim
>

1) he's a troll that's upset because nobody of consequence uses his stuff
anymore

2) he registered that name 8 years after we were using ours, and it only
got approved 13 years after we started this project

3) he is assuming that a US trademark affects the global user base, which
it does not

Bottom line, his project will eventually fade away into obscurity.

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread Carl Kleffner
FYI , you can find this:
https://www.spi-inc.org/projects/mingw/


Am Sa., 8. Mai 2021 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb sisyphus :

> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 11:13 PM Zach Bacon  wrote:
>
> > Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
> > constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not.
> >
>
> Yeah, but that needs to be tested in a court first.
> Keith has implied that it's "fait accompli", and that's just bullshit.
>
> Still ... I guess it pays to be mindful of the possibilities ...
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
> ___
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread sisyphus
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 11:13 PM Zach Bacon  wrote:

> Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
> constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not.
>

Yeah, but that needs to be tested in a court first.
Keith has implied that it's "fait accompli", and that's just bullshit.

Still ... I guess it pays to be mindful of the possibilities ...

Cheers,
Rob

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread Zach Bacon
Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not. However
like Biswa, I'm no lawyer.

On Sat., May 8, 2021, 9:05 a.m. Biswapriyo Nath, 
wrote:

> This is not MinGW, this is MinGW-w64. BTW, I'm just a normal human not a
> lawyer.
>
> ___
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread Biswapriyo Nath
This is not MinGW, this is MinGW-w64. BTW, I'm just a normal human not a
lawyer.

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread sisyphus
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:28 PM Joachim Wuttke 
wrote:

> Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
> that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
> myself culpable by recommending use of your software.
>
> What is your position on this?
>
>
:-

Sorry ...(I assume that) I'm not one of the people to whom this post is
addressed.
But it's Sat'dy night over here, I've had half a bottle of wine, and I just
couldn't resist the invitation.

Cheers,
Rob

___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public


[Mingw-w64-public] MINGW trademark claims

2021-05-08 Thread Joachim Wuttke

Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
myself culpable by recommending use of your software.

What is your position on this?

Kind regards and thanks for mingw-w64, Joachim


___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public