[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in winevt.h

From b513617123950018bf75f0cae790b0576e9ad157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Biswapriyo Nath Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:04:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in winevt.h Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath --- mingw-w64-headers/include/winevt.h | 21 ++--- 1 file

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Revert "headers: Move IP_MREQ from _ip_mreq1.h to ws2ipdef.h."

在 6/26/21 6:10 PM, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: Thanks for the explanation. Two questions. 1. If I include winsock.h for ip_mreq it compiles. But if I include winsock2.h for ip_mreq it does not compile. Does winsock2.h need _ip_mreq1.h to be included? It is necessary to include ws2ipdef.h after

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Revert "headers: Move IP_MREQ from _ip_mreq1.h to ws2ipdef.h."

Thanks for the explanation. Two questions. 1. If I include winsock.h for ip_mreq it compiles. But if I include winsock2.h for ip_mreq it does not compile. Does winsock2.h need _ip_mreq1.h to be included? 2. If I include winsock.h or winsock2.h for ipv6_mreq neither works. Does ipv6_mreq need same

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Revert "headers: Move IP_MREQ from _ip_mreq1.h to ws2ipdef.h."

在 6/26/21 1:10 PM, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: Forgot the patch file. Thanks. Pushed to master. The Windows 8 SDK actually duplicates the definition of `struct ip_mreq` in both and , so I think it is not valid to remove it there. We have the '_ip_mreq1.h' which is nothing but duplication. This