Re: [Mingw-w64-public] gcc parameter -mcrtdll= for choosing Windows C RunTime DLL library

2022-11-20 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:59 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 16:44:08 +0100 > > From: Pali Rohár > > Cc: g...@gcc.gnu.org, mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > Installing a redistributable is a nuisance, and dependence on non-system > > > libraries might

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Invalid DLL when linking VS2019 (vc142) lib

2022-01-22 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 12:40 PM Martin Storsjö wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022, Matthew Brett wrote: > > > The Scipy build links against a static library `npymath.lib`, until > > recently built with VS2017 v141 toolset. > > Mixing static librar

[Mingw-w64-public] Invalid DLL when linking VS2019 (vc142) lib

2022-01-22 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, We have run into a puzzling error when building the Scipy project with mingw-w64. The Scipy build links against a static library `npymath.lib`, until recently built with VS2017 v141 toolset. This build worked fine, until recently when the build for `npymath.lib` switched to using the VS2019

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] UCRT compiler does not recognize printf format flags it can parse at run-time

2022-01-19 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:41 PM Martin Storsjö wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Matthew Brett wrote: > > > We've run into a problem over at > > https://github.com/rgommers/scipy/issues/118 > > > > The essence of the problem i

[Mingw-w64-public] UCRT compiler does not recognize printf format flags it can parse at run-time

2022-01-19 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, We are currently using the UCRT build of MinGW-w64 to build the Scipy library for Python - thanks for all your work that has made this possible. We've run into a problem over at https://github.com/rgommers/scipy/issues/118 The essence of the problem is that the *compiler* warns when we use

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Poll] Move to git

2014-05-09 Thread Matthew Brett
Am 09.05.2014 15:52, schrieb JonY: For mingw-w64 developers, state your SF ID; for the registered voters, simply reply with the same email address you registered with. [X] Yes, move to git [ ] No, continue with SVN --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Register your vote (was Re: mingw-w64 may move to git in the future)

2014-05-02 Thread Matthew Brett
* I intend to submit patches for any problems I find while testing numerics on Windows I'm an experienced user of svn and git: http://sourceforge.net/u/matthewbrett/profile/ https://github.com/matthew-brett Best, Matthew

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-29 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Rodny spillig...@gmx.com wrote: JonY jon_y@... writes: Hi, mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can now do multiple repos per project. Structure wise, everything under trunk will still stay together in the new repo,

[Mingw-w64-public] Advice on accuracy of exp function

2014-04-29 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, I'm sorry to ask this question without more information, but I'm hoping you can give me an idea what more information I need. Some of us got very interested in using Mingw-w64 as the standard compiler for Python numerical tools such as numpy and scipy: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Advice on accuracy of exp function

2014-04-29 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote: 2014-04-29 21:16 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm sorry to ask this question without more information, but I'm hoping you can give me an idea what more information I need. Some of us got

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net wrote: On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote: mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can now do multiple repos per project. *snip* Discuss. I'm a bit surprised at the choice of Git -- in my

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net wrote: On 4/28/2014 5:17 AM, JonY wrote: mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Matthew Brett
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28.04.2014 22:42, Adrien Nader wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:04 AM, John E. / TDM

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28.04.2014 23:29, Matthew Brett wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, LRN wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Project News | New Builds]

2014-04-25 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:35 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 4/25/2014 23:37, Dongsheng Song wrote: You may need to use winpthread if you want to use --enable-libgomp. Yes. In my situation, we

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Bug fix for expm1 - how to proceed?

2014-04-19 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello Matthew, 2014-04-16 20:36 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com: Hi, Sorry for my ignorance about mingw-w64

[Mingw-w64-public] Bug fix for expm1 - how to proceed?

2014-04-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, Sorry for my ignorance about mingw-w64 - I am hoping for advice on submitting a patch. When testing against the Python numpy library, we found a failing test for the mingw-w64 expm1 routine. Specifically, we found that: double i = -0.0; return expm1(i); returns 0 instead of -0, as I

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Bug fix for expm1 - how to proceed?

2014-04-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello Matthew, 2014-04-16 20:36 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com: Hi, Sorry for my ignorance about mingw-w64 - I am hoping for advice on submitting a patch. When testing against the Python numpy